The answer = Poe and King wrote both nonfiction and fiction <span>is not a similarity between Edgar Allan Poe and Stephen King.
</span><span>Poe had a very dark and scary mood.He had setting going on around the short story.Whereas,King has a very similar style of those horror and dark settings.
</span>So,
As a conclusion,the best answer is :
<span>A) Poe and King wrote nonfiction about the writer’s craft</span>
According to Churchill, the continuation of British life as it is currently known is at stake in the battle against Germany. The lengthy traditions of Great Britain are a stake.
Wunston Churchull was a British politician, army officer, and writer. He served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1940 to 1945, when he led Britain to victory in the Second World War, and again from 1951 to 1955. He was also member of the Parliament, He was ideologically an economic liberal and imperialist,
He made difference between love and hate
I think it's C.
Because, lemme put commas on each sentences....
(1) If you ask me, Jerry is a tennis whiz.
<span>(2) When she is worried, Lucille eats a lot. </span>
<span>(3) Jerry loves tennis, he plays everyday. </span>
<span>(4) Lucille bought a new tennis racket and brought it home. << Where should I put it?
</span>
So, (4) is automatically out of question. (1) and (2) seems okay with comma, but (3) is a little bit weird. (3) supposed to have 'and' in the middle, but it's not there. So, you can put semicolon there, to separate the words.
Answer:
Bradbury wrote this essential dystopian novel describing what would be the main threat to the future of culture: in the future censorship will reach the status of unnecessary if we can make no one bother to inquire, to worry about challenging their thoughts. In opening a book.
For many, this text is correct as a predictor of the contradictions of the modern era: in times in which the social mass is so plural, the media are more careful than ever to transmit messages that do not offend anyone, so they bet on a lowest common denominator that ends up suppressing the plurality of ideas and the development of knowledge. A radically anti-intellectual culture.
He wants the reader to be able to perceive this and not let technology consume it entirely. That he inquires and questions things.
