At the time there were a lot of advancements being made in the textile industry; therefore increased the demand for slave labour. What the cotton gin did was it made picking cotton a much quicker process, and this led slave-owners. So the cotton INCREASED a demand for slave labour because it make cotton-picking much more profitable. So the answer for your question is C :) I hope this helped you xx
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Their about going up in society. I hope this helps you.
Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
The main cause was because they had already established land but the white settlers took it from them. For Native Americans, this was unacceptable.
In any country or state, all the nature- gifted things are considered as the parts of natural heritage. ... As a whole, natural heritage is the gift of nature whereas cultural heritage is associated with the man-made things and the things which were found during the different phases of human civilisation.
