Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
Answer:
Having a high amount of student loans and tuition debt means that your FICO score will reflect this amount of debt and if it is defaulted on even once or timely payments are not made, your credit score will suffer which will make life so much harder in a country like the U.S.
For a long time after college, you will probably be unable to buy a house unless you find a really good job that will help you pay off the student loan. This is because the loan already means that you have a high debt burden and then keeping up with both those payments and mortgage payments can be difficult.
- Forgoing your dream career
A lot of the time, people are forced to give up the life they wanted in order to pursue another job that will enable them pay off their student loans especially in cases where their dream careers don't pay much or will take some time to pay off.
Answer and Explanation:
<u>What functions as a subject is not really the relative clause, but the relative pronoun - "that".</u> Relative pronouns can act as subjects or objects in the clause they introduce. Let's compare:
1. I am the only person who saw Erica.
2. I am the only person who Erica saw and recognized.
Notice that in sentence 1, "who" is the subject of the clause "saw Erica". However, in sentence 2, "who" is the object. The subject of the verb "saw" now is "Erica".
<u>The same happens in the clause "that was hurt before". The relative pronoun "that" - which is substituting the noun "ankle" - is the subject of the clause "was hurt before". Therefore, we can say its noun function is the subject.</u>
Answer:
the animals will live happily ever after on the farm
Explanation:
the passage describes the farm like a fantasy
