All categories

2 years ago

Prior to Julius Caesar, what three sections divided the Roman Empire’s government?1.king, crown prince, and cabinet

English

2 answers:

malfutka [58]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is “magistrates, senate, and tribunes”

Explanation

Before Julius Cesar, the Roman government was separate in three parts in order to guarantee that the laws were fair, and everyone was represented correctly without leaving anyone apart.

The magistrates were officials that practiced law acting like priests who governed in the name of the Senate and people

The Senate was a group of 300 people who counselled the officials, previously elected, controlled finances and dealt with foreign relations.

The tribunes where in which the citizens voted for laws and officials.

faust18 [17]2 years ago

6 0

Based on the answer choices magistrates, senate, and tribunes is the best answer, but I believe the answer is Consuls, senate, and assembly

You might be interested in

Identify the sentence that varies from formal standard English.

blagie [28]

The correct answer is A

4 0

2 years ago

Does spelling almost always reflects pronouciation

mylen [45]

No and yes well kinda because pterodactyl you can't hear the p whats the point of putting it if you can't hear it.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

One charge against Socrates was that his teaching was destructive. In at least 150 words, defend Socrates as he might defend him

bezimeni [28]

Socrates speaks in a very plain, conversational manner. He explains that he has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed: with honesty and directness. He explains that his behavior stems from a prophecy by the oracle at Delphi which claimed that he was the wisest of all men. Recognizing his ignorance in most worldly affairs, Socrates must be wiser than other men only in that he knows nothing. In order to spread this peculiar wisdom, Socrates explains that he considered it his duty to question supposed "wise" men and to expose their false wisdom as ignorance

7 0

3 years ago

What does "string" means as used in this sentence? String of war heroes

AlexFokin [52]

A sequence of similar objects or events sufficiently close in time or space to be perceived as a group

4 0

3 years ago

The author of document C chooses to mention the increasing number of bullet rounds used in order to convey. Question 4 options:

user100 [1]

From the memoirs of Otto Lais, a member of the German Infantry Regiment number one hundred and sixty-nine, it is observed that certain comments were made in relation to the Battle of the Somme which lasted between 1914-1916.

A portion of the excerpt reads as follows:

"Belt after belt was fire, 250 rounds - 1000 - 3000...18,000 rounds!"

In order to determine what he meant by this statement, it is important to read the protext, the text, and the statement in context.

Hence the portions immediately before and after the statement relating to the number of bullets read thus:

"The machine gunners were earning their pay today. Belt after belt was fired, 250 rounds - 1,000 - 3,000...The British kept charging forward. Despite the fact that hundreds are already lying dead in the shell holes to our front, fresh waves keep emerging from the assault trenches...18,000 rounds!"

Then there is the last sentence from that excerpt:

"The youth of England bled to death in front of Serre (our position)"

The report was one of bravery on their part and how they "dealt" with the English Army. Hence, the reference to bullet rounds was used to convey a sense of patriotism (Option D).

If he meant to convey hatred, the document would have been filled with words describing the British army in such a manner.

See the link below to learn more about the Battle of the Somme:

brainly.com/question/789196

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers