1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MariettaO [177]
4 years ago
7

Canada is a nation with many ethnic groups. The two main groups are the English and the French Canadians. Both English and Frenc

h are the official languages in Canada. Quebec is the home for many French Canadians. In the 1970s, Quebec made laws against using English on signs. English-speaking residents fought the laws in court. The court ruled that the laws needed to be changed to allow English on signs. How is this situation an example of a the conflict between cultures?
History
1 answer:
VMariaS [17]4 years ago
6 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

This situation is an example of the conflict between cultures in that people from one culture do not have the criteria and tolerance to think on the other group of Canadians that speak English, and tries to impose their will against the other group.

Although Canada is a first-world country with a developed economy and high education, the conflicts of cultures is an issue difficult to handle by the government and society. People have to understand that they have the same nationality and by no means is valid to create division and separation between the citizens.

It is like in the Toronto and western Canada region, political authorities only authorized English in schools or markets. That would be inconceivable.

In this case of cultural conflicts, people have to advocate respect and tolerance to generate understanding.

You might be interested in
“It is proposed that humble application be made for an act of Parliament of Great Britain, by virtue of which one general govern
Dovator [93]
 the first sec and last one...........
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the marshall plan do
qaws [65]

the answer your'e looking for is D the american's sent aid to Europe in order to combat the spread of communism, they figured if you send countries aid their more likely to move towards a democracy than communism

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The middle classes in colonial America consisted of
WARRIOR [948]
The middle classes of colonial America consisted mostly of yeomanfarmers and skilled craftsmen.Differentiate between the economic activities of the middle classes of the New England, midAtlantic,and Southern colonies
In an agriculturebasedeconomy, most of the middle class was engaged in some type of farming,with yeoman farmersowning their own land and supporting families on its products.In cities, those in the middle class were skilled craftsmen and artisans.Economic patterns in the MidAtlanticregion were similar to those in New England, with somevariations for the ethnic origins of various immigrant communities.The Southern Colonies were mainly dominated by the wealthy planters but manysmall subsistence farms were family owned and operated.animal husbandryAnimal husbandry is the agricultural practice of breeding and raising livestock.yeomanA former class of small freeholders who farm their own land; a commoner of good standing.craftsmenAn artisan or craftsman (craftsperson) is a skilled manual worker who makes items that may befunctional or strictly decorative, including furniture, clothing, jewelry, household items, and toolsor even machines such as the handmade devices of a watchmaker.Give us feedback on this content:FULL TEXT [ edit ]The Colonial Middle ClassNew England: Farmers, Craftsmen, MerchantsIn New England, the Puritans created selfgoverningcommunities ofreligious congregations of farmers (yeomen) and their families. Highlevelpoliticians gaveout plots of land to male settlers, or proprietors, who then divided the land amongthemselves. Every white man was intended to have enough land to support a family.Most New England parents tried to help their sons establish farms of their own. When sonsmarried, fathers gave them gifts of land, livestock, or farming equipment; daughters receivedhousehold goods, farm animals, and/or cash. Families increased their productivity byexchanging goods and labor with each other. They loaned livestock and grazing land to oneanother and worked together to spin yarn, sew quilts, and shuck corn. Migration, agriculturalinnovation, and economic cooperation were creative measures that preserved New England'syeoman society until the 19 century.By 1750, a variety of artisans, shopkeepers, and merchants provided services to the growingfarming population. Blacksmiths, wheelwrights, and furniture makers set up shops in ruralvillages. There they built and repaired goods needed by farm families.MidAtlanticEconomic patterns in the MidAtlanticregion were very similar to those in New England,with some variations for the ethnic origins of various immigrant communities. Forinstance, German immigrants were renowned for their skill with animal husbandry andwomen in German immigrant communities worked in the fields.Before 1720, most colonists in the midAtlanticregion worked with smallscalefarming andpaid for imported manufactures by supplying the West Indies with corn and flour. In NewYork, a furpeltexport trade to Europe flourished adding additional wealth to the region.After 1720, midAtlanticfarming was stimulated by the international demand for wheat. Athmassive population explosion in Europe brought wheat prices up. By 1770, a bushel of wheatcost twice as much as it did in 1720. Farmers also expanded their production of flax seed andcorn, since flax was in high demand in the Irish linen industry and a demand for corn existedin the West Indies.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the cartoon why might Americans have resented british imperialism
tresset_1 [31]
My interpretation of the comic is it shows "England" taking over all those places
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can you imagine the United States without federalism? Without state governments? For your discussion this week, describe a chang
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

     I don't think that it would be an improvement.   I think that most like being able to have a say on who is standing up for our rights at a local level. Most people have more trust in those people that are local and can better understand how local people feel.  Some changes that would occur would be that we would only have one person that would be doing most of the ruling or calling the shots for the government.  We would not have any say on those people that would be doing the governing.

     I think that the reason that they have adopted this approach is  because they want more local people to have a say in the law.  These  people have a better sense and understanding of the local and state  government issues. The national government can sometimes have a  basic attitude or a compromised agenda. I do think that this a good  idea.  I do think that most individuals would prefer that the national  government be limited on their input on such matters.  I think that the  less that the national government gets involved in our personal lives the  better.  A lot of matters are small enough that the local and state levels should be able to handle them.

    Dual federalism is the clear division of governing authority between national and state governments.  Competitive federalism is the mingled government authority, with functions overlapping the state and national governments.

    I would advise them to approach the issue of federalism by making everything equal.  They should give more discretion and power to the states because some of the things the government wants the states to do, the states do not have funding for it.

    My own political loyalties are most strongly felt for my hometown.   I think the community is what accounts for my outlook.  I like to think that I have great pride in my country.  With that, I  think that as time goes on my pride is lessening.  The strong values  that once were are no longer and that is so sad.  We as Americans used to show respect for one another and be grateful for once fought and continue to fight for our rights, but as of right now in  our society I feel that a lot of people are only out for themselves and  lack respect.  They tend to forget that these laws and rights that they  want to complain about, they wouldn’t even have a choice if it  wouldn’t be for the men and women that fought for our rights. It is a  very fine line to me on how I feel because I love this country, but I feel  that some government officials have their own agendas and are not  thinking about what is best for our country. I really think that since Trump  has taken office things have changed for the better.  I believe that  people are showing skeptical possession of the country right now.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which would be good historical evidence when studying Manifest Destiny? A) a chart showing the Louisiana Purchase in current dol
    14·2 answers
  • Martin Luther King Jr. advocated for the use of nonviolent resistance to fight for equal rights.
    14·1 answer
  • What was the name of the first economically successful English colony?
    12·2 answers
  • If you were given the chance to write to with both aquino and locsin this speech, what issues in 1986 would you like to address
    9·1 answer
  • Please help will mark brainliest.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these was NOT a reason
    10·1 answer
  • She loves Romeo but does not want to marry him.
    6·1 answer
  • HELP BRAINLIST ANSWER
    8·2 answers
  • By working together in _____________, women gained some of the skills and tactics necessary to effectively organize.
    13·1 answer
  • A map of the United States showing the percentage population of foreign-born residents in each state. 12 states including Montan
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!