1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Llana [10]
3 years ago
5

What were the major problems in the earliest judiciary system for Indian Territory and how were the problems solved?

History
1 answer:
Allisa [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Indian Constitution, which is the supreme law of the country, provides the framework of the present legal and judicial system of the country. India’s judicial system follows a “common law system” along with the regulatory law and the statutory law. Another important feature of our legal system is that it is based on the adversarial system, in which two sides of the story is presented in every case to a neutral judge, who would then give a judgment based on the arguments and evidence of the case.

However, our judicial system faces certain inherent problems, which show the weaknesses and defects of the system, and which requires immediate reforms and accountability.

Explanation:

Challenges faced by Indian judicial system

Corruption in judiciary: Like any other institution of the Government, the Indian judicial system is equally corrupted. The various recent scams like the CWG scam, 2G scam, Adarsh Society scam, including rapes and other atrocities in the society etc. have emphasised both the conduct of politicians and public dignitaries, including the common man, and also on the drawbacks in the functioning of Indian judiciary. There is no system of accountability. The media also do not give a clear picture on account of the fear of contempt. There is no provision for registering an FIR against a judge taking bribes without taking the permission of the Chief Justice of India.

Backlog of pending cases: India’s legal system has the largest backlog of pending cases in the world – as many as 30 million pending cases. Of them, over four million are High Court cases, 65,000 Supreme Court cases. This number is continuously increasing and this itself shows the inadequacy of the legal system. It has always been discussed to increase the number of judges, creating more courts, but implementation is always late or inadequate. The victims are the ordinary or poor people, while the rich can afford expensive lawyers and change the course of dispensation of the law in their favour. This also creates a big blockade for international investors and corporations to do business in India. And also due to this backlog, most of the prisoners in India’s prisons are detainees awaiting trial. It is also reported that in Mumbai, India’s financial hub, the courts are burdened with age-old land disputes, which act as a hurdle in the city’s industrial development.

Lack of transparency: Another problem facing the Indian judicial system is the lack of transparency. It is seen that the Right to Information (RTI) Act is totally out of the ambit of the legal system. Thus, in the functioning of the judiciary, the substantial issues like the quality of justice and accountability are not known properly.

Hardships of the undertrials: In Indian jails, most of the prisoners are undertrials, who are confined to the jails till their case comes to a definite conclusion. In most of the cases, they end up spending more time in the jail than the actual term that might have had been awarded to them had the case been decided on time and, assuming, against them. Plus, the expenses and pain and agony of defending themselves in courts is worse than serving the actual sentence. Undertrials are not guilty till convicted. On the other hand, the rich and powerful people can bring the police to their sides, and the police can harass or silence inconvenient and poor persons, during the long ordeals in the courts.

No interaction with the society: It is very essential that the judiciary of any country should be an integral part of the society and its interactions with the society must be made regular and relevant. It is also seen that there is involvement of common citizens in judicial decision-making in several countries. However, in India, the Indian judicial system has no connection with the society, something which it had inherited from the British judicial set-up. But, things should have changed over the last 60 years. Even today, the law officers have not been able to come closer to the ground to meet the common people.

We see that in spite of all the advancements in information and communication technologies changing the life of the people of the country dramatically, the India legal system still looks like a domineering and pretentious British vestige appearing to belong to an elite class away from the people and the country. As a matter of fact, the present system of justice is totally out of place and out of time and tune with democratic procedures and norms, that please only a certain section of the society with vested interests. Therefore, there is an immediate need to restructure the entire judicial system to make it answerable to the needs of a democratic, progressive society.

You might be interested in
What are some of the limitations on abortion that the Supreme Court has allowed since the Roe v. Wade decision
Assoli18 [71]
     <span> I don't think third trimester abortions are allowed unless the health of the woman is in danger. 

</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Its attached answer it pls
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

pretty much a golden rule or to keep a balance or... "you do this

and this is your punisment"

5 0
3 years ago
In what ways were the Olmec-influenced cultures of the Aztecs and Maya both similar and different from each other?
Dima020 [189]
The Aztecs and the Mayans were two ancient societies in Meso America. The Mayan civilization goes back to about 1800-2000 BC and was in decline when the Spaniards arrived whereas the Aztecs were a much younger civilization that was at its peak when Cortez arrived. The Aztecs were located mostly in what is now Mexico whereas the Mayans were more in what is now Guatemala and Honduras. Both the Aztecs and Mayans believed in human sacrifice but the Aztecs did this much more than the Mayans. While the Aztecs layed out their cities according to celestial observances, the Mayans were more scientific and developed a calendar very similar to our modern calendar. The Aztecs had one supreme ruler whereas the Mayans had many city states like Uxmal in Guatemala and Copan in Honduras with local rulers.
8 0
4 years ago
Regarding the Atlantic charter, how was the Soviet Union different than the United States and Great Britain? The United States a
erica [24]

The USA and GB did not seek to obtain new lands

8 0
3 years ago
5. What would life and human relations be like in the absence of government?
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

umm they will be ruined and will fight until they kill each other

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main purpose of the thirteenth amendment
    13·2 answers
  • when the boucicauts established the worlds first department store they introduced many changes make the statement if it accurate
    6·1 answer
  • How did the U.S. fight the Spanish-A War on two fronts?
    10·1 answer
  • WHAT DOES Realisationsvinstbeskattning MEAN????
    7·1 answer
  • Warfare in which a group of people use tactical strategies of hiding in the terrain and sneaking attacks is called what?
    9·1 answer
  • Who gained control of the channel of water between England and France and the North Sea?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment?
    11·1 answer
  • The Soviet Union lost the Cold War because:
    10·2 answers
  • THIS IS FOR THE GEORGIA IN THE UNITED STATES NOT THE OTHER ONE
    10·1 answer
  • Drag the names to order the planets based on their distance from the sun, beginning
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!