<span>a disillusionment over the outcomes of the war</span>
The US was the 'city upon a hill': Using early Puritan ideology abolitionists saw the US as a beacon of equality and freedom which slavery spit in the face of.
The US had been a model for political philosophy and an experiment which was mostly a success but slavery was a flaw. Abolitionists believed we could not be a beacon of freedom with the system in place. The US government refused to deal with the issue and compromises furthered the practice instead of limiting or eliminating it.
B the answer is "b" I remember learning this in class
The term historians use when they discuss the relationship between two events in which one is the direct result of another is causation.
Historians may employ the concept of causation in a wide range of ways, each of which is linked with different historiographical claims and different kinds of argumentation.
Through this application, it will be clear that historical narratives are causal, and that micro-history can be seen as a response to a very specific (causal) problem of Braudelian macro-history.
Answer:
The dominant social system in medieval Europe, in which the nobility held lands from the Crown in exchange for military service, and vassals were in turn tenants of the nobles, while the peasants (villeins or serfs) were obliged to live on their lord's land and give him homage, labour, and a share of the produce,
Explanation:
