1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
docker41 [41]
4 years ago
8

Read this article and examine the accompanying political cartoon . Then, explain the elements of the cartoon and what it represe

nts.
History
1 answer:
GenaCL600 [577]4 years ago
7 0

What is the political cartoon I don’t see one

You might be interested in
Which two trade goods were the most important to the african trading empires of ghana, mali, and songhai? check all that apply.
Vaselesa [24]
They traded A.Salt , D.Gold
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What term does lincoln use instead of union
Julli [10]
In the Gettysburg address Lincoln uses the word nation instead of union.
5 0
4 years ago
Is coup d’etat means overthrow?
MArishka [77]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
(GIVING BRAINLIEST) Which statement best completes the diagram
uranmaximum [27]

Answer:

the answer is D. i just took the test

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the sequence of events leading to the arms-for-hostages proposal and its execution ?
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

The Iran–Contra affair (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: Caso Irán–Contra), popularized in Iran as the McFarlane affair, the Iran–Contra scandal, or simply Iran–Contra, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to the Khomeini government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo. The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.

The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.The first arms sales authorized to Iran were in 1981, prior to the American hostages having been taken in Lebanon.

The plan was later complicated in late 1985, when Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council diverted a portion of the proceeds from the Iranian weapon sales to fund the Contras, a group of anti-Sandinista rebels, in their insurgency against the socialist government of Nicaragua.While President Ronald Reagan was a vocal supporter of the Contra cause,[6] the evidence is disputed as to whether he personally authorized the diversion of funds to the Contras.Handwritten notes taken by Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger on 7 December 1985 indicate that Reagan was aware of potential hostage transfers with Iran, as well as the sale of Hawk and TOW missiles to "moderate elements" within that country.Weinberger wrote that Reagan said "he could answer to charges of illegality but couldn't answer to the charge that 'big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free the hostages.'"[8] After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.[9] The investigation was impeded when large volumes of documents relating to the affair were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.On 4 March 1987, Reagan made a further nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for the affair and stating that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages".

The affair was investigated by the U.S. Congress and by the three-person, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither investigation found evidence that President Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs] In the end, fourteen administration officials were indicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. Eleven convictions resulted, some of which were vacated on appeal. The rest of those indicted or convicted were all pardoned in the final days of the presidency of George H. W. Bush, who had been Vice President at the time of the affair.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Whiskey Rebellion Arose In Response To A Major Problem That Faced The New Nation. What Was The Major Problem And How Did It
    13·1 answer
  • What invention greatly reduced the time it took European immigrants to travel overseas?
    15·2 answers
  • Please Help! 20 points
    7·2 answers
  • Distinguish between your constitutional rights in a school vs. your constitutional rights outside of school.
    15·1 answer
  • Was Greece a United Kingdom like Egypt
    13·2 answers
  • Before the Agricultural Revolution, many people lived in rural areas because
    12·2 answers
  • Helena made a diagram to compare two kinds of fish. Which label belongs in the area marked Y?
    11·2 answers
  • What position enabled Monroney to promote the creation of the FAA?
    12·1 answer
  • 19 and its talking about chinas 5 year plan
    11·2 answers
  • How is the mandate of heaven similar or different to the Sphinx and the stone Stele of Hammurabi’s code?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!