Answer: 1.The first part was unnecessary and the second part had words that were redundant
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues.
Explanation:
1. The first part was unnecessary, since it was transitional phrases. The second part had words that were redundant. For example, you don't need the re in front of duplicate and with the word again. Or office in government with voting,
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues. The motto less is more pertains to this sentence.
Answer and Explanation:
There is the same error repeated in two places in this sentence. This is because the sentence needs conjunctions before the verb "to fly" and before the word "lucy". Conjunctions are words that allow connections between the clauses of a sentence, allowing them to be read with fluidity and cohesion. Without these conjunctions, sentences are incorrect and incoherent.
The sentence written with the conjunctions correctly would be:
"Learning how to fly a plane and swimming were two skills that Lucy really wanted to learn."
"small boat"
how boat? => small boat.
the answer is "small".
"turbulend river"
how river? => turbulent river
the answer is "turbulent".
Good luck with :))
Here are the answers to the given questions above:
1. <span>Plato’s dialogues, including the Apologia, are classical texts. The answer would be option A.
2. </span>The Socratic method refers to questioning definitions of concepts expressed by people. The answer would be option C.
Hope these answer your questions.
Answer: The correct answer is : It has a disadvantage since Duke promotes the conspiracy theory of the genocide of white people and ensures that the Jews are organizing the white genocide. Duke supports voluntary racial segregation, white separatism, anti-communism, the preservation of Western culture, is a holocaust denier.
