1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergejj [24]
3 years ago
10

Explain why you think the close ties between church and state in Massachusetts helped or hurt their government?

History
1 answer:
Sladkaya [172]3 years ago
4 0
<span>The close ties between the church and the state in Massachusetts did not help the government, but rather hurt the government. Although the Church and the government had close ties with each other but still it was not right for the church to have a say in the government. Church would always want the members of their religion in the government and that would have a negative impact on the government and people as a whole. General people’s ideas would not find importance if the government was controlled by the church.  </span>


You might be interested in
. Which of these developments in Africa was a cause of the other three? (1) Rival tribal groups fought wars. (2) The Berlin Conf
balandron [24]
4) African economies became dependent on the sale of cash crops and raw materials. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the language of the the declaration of independence make it effective?
4vir4ik [10]
The Declaration of Independence was written so that those who couldn't get formal schooling could read and understand what it was saying.It was written for the average person of that time to be able to comprehend.
8 0
3 years ago
Who was the first African American since reconstruction to be elected to Congress
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

If it is an answer choice, it should be Joseph Rainey

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the English Bill of Rights on the development of the U.S Constitution?
guapka [62]

Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.

6 0
3 years ago
Who fought on the side of the republicans in the spanish civil war
Bond [772]
Anti-communist groups fascist rebel troops a professional army of international volunteers
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Choose three of the following questions to ask Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad:
    5·1 answer
  • What challenges were faced by industrial workers in the factories and cities during the industrial revolution?
    9·1 answer
  • In what city did the first presidential inauguration occur
    8·2 answers
  • Who were the Grangers
    9·1 answer
  • Which event led the United States to enter World War II?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following applies to Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy?
    10·2 answers
  • First president of us?
    13·2 answers
  • What caused the shift from hunting to farming?
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think hitler and mussolini were more alike or different?
    12·1 answer
  • Por que filosofa hannah arendt hablaba de la democracia como un sistema antiguo
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!