1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Volgvan
3 years ago
12

Do you have to own stocks to be affected by the stock market? Please explain in 3-5 sentences.

History
2 answers:
7nadin3 [17]3 years ago
8 0

You do not have to own stocks to be affected by the stock market. The stock market affects the economy which can affect your job. For example, if the stock market causes a recession, then the recession can affect your job or your career.

BartSMP [9]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

It would effect you if you were in stocks, but also if you are not. Stocks are like supply and demand. So, if stock drop, there are a low supply, meaning they cost more overall. So if the stocks of, lets say, Apple falls, all Apple products will cost more due to the lack of the amount. Sorry this is so short, but that is the basic answer.

You might be interested in
I nees your help guys please
fgiga [73]
Whats the question? I need you to clarify so i can help.
8 0
2 years ago
What does Thomas Malthus say about food supply and population control?
AlexFokin [52]
Malthus believed that if a population is allowed to grow unchecked, people will begin to starve and will go to war over increasingly scarce resources, also <span>Malthus cautioned that in order to avoid catastrophe such as famine and war, people should enact deliberate population control, such as birth control and celibacy.
So I believe the answer would be D. Having fewer children means more food is available to meet the needs of the population.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did european countries mainly compete to control territory in the new world?
densk [106]
The Americas had generally good soil. Cash Crops were planted.

Also, the more territory a country owned (still relatively true today) the more powerful it was(/is).

4 0
3 years ago
Why is it inaccurate to say the roman empire "fell" ?
wariber [46]

Answer:

Ok please dont say that my answer was wrong but this is what from I think:

I think that it was offensive to them to say that it FELL since they are royal in their own ways and they probably like it as if it were said to be : "fallen"? They probably don't like admitting defeat so they try to make it present or like really cool in their own ways. DISCLAIMER: WHAT I THINK!!!

7 0
2 years ago
¿Debería Estados Unidos volverse más socialista<br> ?
sesenic [268]

Answer:

¿si quizas?

Explanation:

por favor agrégame como más inteligente

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The turning point in Greek history is considered to be the _____.
    7·2 answers
  • how many people do historians estimate lived within the boundaries of the current United states of America?​
    15·1 answer
  • Why did it take until 1944 for allied to liberate prisoners of concentration camps
    6·2 answers
  • Which country became the sixth nation to have nuclear weapons in 1974?
    8·2 answers
  • Which created the most resentment among European nations?
    12·1 answer
  • How did rearmament impact Germany’s economy and politics?
    15·1 answer
  • What did the federal highway act do
    14·2 answers
  • 7 things that Franklin D Roosevelt
    9·1 answer
  • The graph below shows the relationship between the number of cookies made and the number of pans used: A graph is shown. The val
    10·1 answer
  • Answer ASAP NO ROCKY!!
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!