Do you have to own stocks to be affected by the stock market? Please explain in 3-5 sentences.

2 answers:

8 0

You do not have to own stocks to be affected by the stock market. The stock market affects the economy which can affect your job. For example, if the stock market causes a recession, then the recession can affect your job or your career.

BartSMP [9]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

It would effect you if you were in stocks, but also if you are not. Stocks are like supply and demand. So, if stock drop, there are a low supply, meaning they cost more overall. So if the stocks of, lets say, Apple falls, all Apple products will cost more due to the lack of the amount. Sorry this is so short, but that is the basic answer.

You might be interested in

Help with history?☹️

Anvisha [2.4K]

Well we can say that they didn't BOTH ban pools or trusts, and they didn't BOTH create commissions, but only the interstate commerce act solely regulated railroads, But they both supported monopolies because working with railroad industries the way the commerce act did was monopolistic and the Sherman antitrust act supported some business activities to be competitive to be monopolistic. SO choice number 3 is the correct answer

8 0

3 years ago

How does Stalin compare the Soviets to Hitler?

Lerok [7]

Answer: B. He hails the USSR as a peace-loving country but depicts Hitler as a treacherous fiend.

Explanation:

The answer is indeed B because on July 3, 1941, less than a month after Hitler launched Operation Babarossa against the Soviet Union, Josef Stalin spoke to the Russian people on radio. He spoke on how Germany had captured much territory and was still pushing forward but tried to motivate the nation by referring to instances when armies met their doom in Russia such as when Napoleon suffered a heavy loss in Russia, a century earlier and promised that the same would happen to Germany.

He then stated that Hitler was a treacherous fiend who broke the Non-Aggression pact he had signed with the Soviet Union in 1939 who were a peace loving nation.

7 0

3 years ago

Plz help with the following questions, Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Someone plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz I have been waiting for so long. Whe

valentinak56 [21]

I haven't taken any US Government courses, but with the magic power of
$Googling\ It!\ ^{TM}$ I looked up these cases.

Tinker v. Des Moines
Established that students' Constitutional rights hold even under school authority.
Four students who wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam War were told to remove them by the schools' principals and suspended after they refused. The parents sued, it got all the way to the Supreme Court, and they ruled in favor of the Tinkers.

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
Holds that school publications can only be regulated with legitimate concern.
A school newspaper run in the Hazelwood School District had articles cut by the principal concerning divorce and teen pregnancy. He was concerned that the articles were inappropriate for school and that people might find out the names of those interviewed regardless of anonymity. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hazelwood School District.

United States v. Nixon
Ruled that the Supreme Court makes all final decisions of whether something is constitutional, and states that not even the president is above the law.
If you haven't heard of the Watergate scandal, it's basically how there was a break-in at the Democrat HQ and Republican and president Richard Nixon was found to have hidden cameras in his offices and was forced to hand over the tapes to the Supreme Court during his case.

In re Gault
Ruled that juveniles also have the right to due process after a poorly handled trial for 15-yo. Gerald Gault where he was denied a right to an attorney among other things.

Plessy v. Ferguson
After a 1/8 black man was told to board a black railroad car, he challenged the doctrine of "seperate but equal" and lost; the provision was maintained until...

Brown v. Board of Education
Overturning the Plessy v. Ferguson decision, this decision said that segregation could not be mandated by gov't because segregated schools were unequal by nature. (This did not ban segregation!)

Bush v. Gore
Though Al Gore was the popular candidate in the 2000 election, George Bush won the electoral college. Gore demanded a recount, but this was deemed unconstitutional because it wouldn't be able to meet the set deadline of December 12th.

Gideon v. Wainwright
The accused in a burglary case, Clarence Gideon, was too poor to afford an attorney to defend himself, and so he sued and the Supreme Court ruled that he must be provided counsel. Over 2000 prisoners were freed in Florida alone after this decision.

Miranda v. Arizona
Mandates officers to tell suspects of their Fifth Amendment rights. (Which are the right to remain silent and right to an attorney)

The answer to #1 is In re Gault.
The answer to #2 is Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education.
The answer to #3 is Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier.

5 0

3 years ago

Which constitutional principle is best expressed by these headlines? HELPPP

Aloiza [94]

Answer:

Rule of law.

Hope this helps

6 0

3 years ago

Why did the federalist favor ratification

LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

They supported the Constitution

Explanation:

The Federalists favored ratification as they were strong supporters of the US Constitution and the system designed by the Constitution.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers