Lycaon did not believe that Jupiter was<u> a god, but he decided to check him anyway. He decided to murder </u><u>Jupiter</u><u> in his sleep, to check out if he was immortal or not. </u>
Also, he thought he will killed an emissary from a neighboring tribe, butchered him, and give him to Jupiter for supper.
<h3>Why was Jupiter upset with Lycaon?</h3>
In the passage, Ovid, a Roman poet has Zeus, known as Jupiter, describes the punishment of an impious king named Lycaon for failing to remember the god and worship him. This event was one of the factors that led Zeus to bring a flood to destroy humans.
<h3>What was Lycaon's crime?</h3>
Lycaon, a legendary king of Arcadia. Traditionally, he was an impious and cruel king who practice to trick Zeus, the king of the gods, into eating human flesh.
Learn more about Lycaon's character:
brainly.com/question/28666060
#SPJ9
The quotation that supports the said statement from the novel is There must be a language that doesn’t depend on words, the boy thought.”
<h3>What does the quote from The Alchemist mean personally?</h3>
The young man had no idea what a "Personal Legend" was. You've always wanted to achieve it, so here you are. When they are young, everyone is aware of their personal legend. Everything is apparent and doable to them at that time in their lives.
The main topic of The Alchemist thus becomes the notion that everyone should live in the solitary pursuit of their own goals.
Hence choice first of the statement is correct:
Learn more about The Alchemist :
brainly.com/question/27775680
#SPJ1
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
Though a certain group may tend to do similar things that lead someone to hate them, this cannot be made true for all members of this group. This is called a "blanket generalization", which may be defined as a set of expectations applied to all the members of one group, typically negative, and usually faulty as a result of bad experience. Blanket generalizations are usually over-generalized.
Members of a group aren't all the same. Even when most of them truthfully have the commonality of a certain negative trait, it is unfair to group the members of that group who are unlike the majority of the group simply because they belong in that group.
Because maybe when he was upset he helped him
