How does the playwight present Mollie Ralston’s

1 answer:

5 0

Mollie Ralston owns a Victorian era estate. She is the youngest owner of owner of Monkswell Manor, who recently got married to Giles Ralston.

Explanation:

The setting of this play is in the early 1950s and the playwright has written the characters according to that 'present' mindsets and advancement accordingly. Agatha Christie, the playwright of Mousetrap, starts off this play on an interesting note with a murder of Lyon in Mollie's estate. Mollie and Giles convert and remodel the estate into a guest house.

Mollie Rolston's character is described as a tall and beautiful woman who is in her twenties. She taught to Corrigan children at a school and could not help one of her students who asked her for help from an abusing uncle that the student had.

She inherited the estate from one of her aunts and she turns it into a guest house. She keeps ignoring the news about the murder in the estate and only bothers about the guests who arrived.

You might be interested in

Imagine that you are a study habit expert. Your friends come to you with questions about how to improve their study habits. COLT

Zarrin [17]

I think you should try studying a little every day.

7 0

3 years ago

What connection does King draw between tension, negotiation, and direct action?

viktelen [127]

For the answer to the question above, the King draws a connection between tension, negotiation, and direct action by claiming that direct action will produce a creative tension that will lead to negotiation.

I hope my answer helped you. Have a nice day!

8 0

3 years ago

In Teens and technology share the future what is it about and who is involve?

Colt1911 [192]

Teens are main consumers of technology

6 0

3 years ago

What is needed to propel the story forward

Murrr4er [49]

An intriguing plot, detailed characters, and an interesting rising action.

5 0

4 years ago

Do you think Proctor dies with his "goodness," as Elizabeth states?

Deffense [45]

Answer: The statement above could be viewed in two (2) perspective:

1. NO! Proctor did not die with his goodness in the circumstance that for as many that he has been good towards could in turn reciprocate the good nature. That would mean his goodness did not die with him.

2. YES! Proctor died with his goodness if on the long run there is no one that could measure with his good nature. Then his goodness did die with him.

Explanation: The statement Elizabeth made could either be True or False depending on the future factors and happenings.

8 0

3 years ago