Depends on what you’re talking about I mean in the case of getting with Romeo it would be the nurse
Answer:
a) Antony wants Caesar to forgive him for being nice to his conspirators.
c) Antony predicts that the land will be bloodied by men fighting men.
e) Antony expects Caesar's ghost to seek retribution for the wrongs done.
Explanation:
The given soliloquy of Antony in Act III scene i of William Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar" is from the scene right after the death of Caesar. The scene shows Antony being given permission by Brutus to give a speech to the people about Caesar.
In the speech, Antony seeks <em>"pardon"</em> to the corpse of Caesar for being <em>"meek and gentle with these butchers"</em> who had murdered him. He prophesied that the land will be full of war, man fighting against the men who had done the murderous deed,
<em>"Domestic fury and fierce civil strife
</em>
<em>Shall cumber all the parts of Italy;
</em>
<em>Blood and destruction shall be so in use"</em>.
He also seeks retribution from Caesar's ghost for the wrongs that had been done to him. He invokes <em>"Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge [.....] hot from hell"</em>, will come and create havoc for the men responsible for his death.
Thus, the correct answers are options a), c) and e).
No, he did not achieve his peace without victory. It was to much of a burden on Germany and the League of Nations didn't include the United States of America.
Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.
