Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option A.
Explanation:
Stated that Indians would no longer be enslaved in Spanish possessions, is the right answer.
New Laws was a customary legislative code, enacted on 20th November 1542 by the then Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Charles V. This code was created to protect the Indians and to eliminate the encomienda system. According to this new code, Indians would no longer be enslaved in Spanish possessions. This code provided the viceroy for Peru and audiencias in Guatemala and Lima to build a more efficient administrative and judicial arrangement.
Answer:
For Freedom
Explanation:
Remember Emancipation Proclamation? Yeah, that's right. They were given freedom, and they fought for freedom. If I was a slave, i'd take up arms as well.
Answer: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States
HOPE THIS HELPS
