After Bunker Hill, how did the British government view the colonial leaders?

History

2 answers:

garri49 [273]3 years ago

8 0

They were traitors and would be hung if caught by the British.

swat323 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is A) They were traitors and would be hung if caught by the British.

After Bunker Hill, the British government viewed the colonial leaders as traitors and would be hung if caught by the British.

The Battle of Bunker Hill was fought on June 17, 1775. The British troops defeated the incipient American Army at the beginning of the Revolutionary War. Breed's Hill and the Charleston Peninsula were under the control of the British. It was not an easy victory for the British. After Bunker Hill, the British government viewed the colonial leaders as traitors and would be hung if caught by the British.

You might be interested in

The United States has decided to restrict American citizens from traveling to a nation suspected of supporting terrorists. Which

DENIUS [597]

A. Foreign

Because its the way the Executive Order Protects The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the Khans of the Golden Horde rule over the Ruussian city-states?

madreJ [45]

Answer:

The campaign was heralded by the Battle of the Kalka River in May 1223, which resulted in a Mongol victory over the forces of several Rus' principalities. ... All Rus' principalities were forced to submit to Mongol rule and became vassals of the Golden Horde empire, some of which lasted until 1480

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following countries in North America is most likely to export zinc?

Irina-Kira [14]

Canada. ...............

3 0

3 years ago

The Greek word that means “rule by the people” is

kati45 [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

The meaning of democracy – from the Greek word – demokratia – is “rule by the people”. As a system of government, it is now almost universally commended. To describe a country, or a policy, as “undemocratic” is to criticise it and those countries that are undemocratic are continually urged towards reform.

Yet, democracy is a complex and contested notion. Moreover, until relatively recently, the idea of rule by the people was as much (if not more) feared as loved. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato, for example, related democracy to the rule of unbridled and untutored passions over cool and reflective reason. Invoking a now common image of the ship of state, Plato asks whether a real ship in stormy waters is sensibly governed by a trained captain who has knowledge of seamanship and navigation or by the crew who have no specialist training. This seems a good question, and although such views are no longer part of the currency of intellectual thought, democrats continue to worry about the role of civic education, for example, in moulding a population so that its members do not just rule, but rule by informed decision making.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help please

Arisa [49]

Answer:

A. To acquire goods such as gold and spices

Explanation:

At that time, Several countries in Europe were involved in competition for supremacy in the western region. Spain, France, and Great Britain was one of the biggest contenders.

So, the Spanish government invested in series of explorations in order to find sources of resources that have high value in the global market (such as gold, spices, tea, silk, and porcelain). The Spanish empire set the conquest to South America because they believed this region possess high amount of Gold and spices.

3 0

3 years ago