Answer:
- It opposes the ideals of the system of capitalism
- It includes both economic and political ideas and principles
- It was supported by Lenin and other Russian revolutionaries
Explanation:
The communism is an ideology that is largely based around equality, self-sustaining, and horizontal hierarchy. Politically, the communism propagates that everyone should be equal in the society, thus there should be only one class, and everyone should have the same opportunities and things at disposal. Economically, the communism is propagating command economy, which is an economy totally owned and controlled by the government, and it has the purpose to make the country a self-sustaining one. During the 20th century there were numerous examples of countries with this system, and there are several in the present as well, but is seems that is not a system that works properly, and it has caused damage to every possible level.
Answer:
Explanation:
just took this test ! the previous answer was excellent, though i'd still like to contribute by seconding from a directly experienced point of view.
1. to imply the main idea of the article
it is clear that though we have the ability to spark a flame with ease, in previous times this was far more difficult to do. it adds to the main idea discussing the importance of matches today.
2. it shows the need for matches
this answer emulates the last one, with a similar idea of how crucial matches are to us. we should be incredibly grateful to have access to an instrument that can produce such a resilient flame.
3. thesaraus
thesarauses are used to find synonyms and antonyms of words, so similar words and opposite words. this student is searching for a word like confusion. he can find confusion in the theasaraus and use the resource to search for a better word.
The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
The answer would be <span>A)James had a great time at the museum; but he left his hat there because the semicolon links the clauses in the compound sentence.
</span>
