What is the best example of legal pluralism? Indian litigants could only pursue their cases in British courts with British judge
s. Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied. The British hired Muslims and Hindu legal experts to explain the English legal system to Indians. Indians could not serve on juries or act as judges. The British used British-style jury trials in all legal proceedings
The best example of legal pluralism is that Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied.
Explanation:
Legal pluralism is a situation in which a territory has several different legal orders and legal systems, often based on the fact that society consists of several social groups with different cultures and traditions or that a state territory has shared sovereignty within, therefore having two nations applying their respective laws. In a situation where there is legal pluralism, the individual group affiliation will determine which legal order the person's case belongs to, or also which legal system the case is processed in. Legal pluralism is in contrast to legal centralism, which is characterized by a common legal order in a territory.
It is important to study the life of Jose Rizal because of his input towards the independence of Philippines. He chose to fight for his country through knowledge and the power of letters. He noticed the continued suffering of his countrymen at the hands of the Spaniards and sought to put an end to this situation.
