What is the best example of legal pluralism? Indian litigants could only pursue their cases in British courts with British judge
s. Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied. The British hired Muslims and Hindu legal experts to explain the English legal system to Indians. Indians could not serve on juries or act as judges. The British used British-style jury trials in all legal proceedings
The best example of legal pluralism is that Indian litigants could have their cases tried in local or British courts, with their own legal customs applied.
Explanation:
Legal pluralism is a situation in which a territory has several different legal orders and legal systems, often based on the fact that society consists of several social groups with different cultures and traditions or that a state territory has shared sovereignty within, therefore having two nations applying their respective laws. In a situation where there is legal pluralism, the individual group affiliation will determine which legal order the person's case belongs to, or also which legal system the case is processed in. Legal pluralism is in contrast to legal centralism, which is characterized by a common legal order in a territory.
It is first well-developed civilization in Asian sub continent, the archaeological remnants provide evidence of well-developed housing, tools for daily living and fine arts skills.
It was Henry Clay who was the primary sponsor of the tariff that was said to have provided protection and regulation on the goods in South Carolina such as cotton and wool. In addition, Henry Clay was a former United States senator wherein he served as the founder of the Whig Party.
