Answer:
Not reasonable because it ignores valid objections that could be raised.
Explanation:
As the author says "There is nothing magic about the number of years in a person's age", it is true there is nothing magic but this is not reasonable because there are two crucial points related to age and driving:
i- development and healthy;
ii- criminal liability and civil responsibility.
Both teenagers and older people have specific age related conditions. Many scientific studies suggest that teenagers don’t have their brain and psychological characteristics fully developed, because they haven’t fully developed their cognition and sense of responsibility they may choose to take more risks when driving such as using cellphone or drinking and driving. On the other side the elderly tends to loose physical strength, having issues with vision, audition or mental abilities, or responding slowly to events and be impaired to operate a vehicle.
So many states will define a minimum age for driving based in the age of criminal liability and civil responsibility stated in the constitution or in laws. It is not just about parents trust and sense of responsibility but also about laws and substantial knowledge about human development.
37% I believe. Hope that helps,
There were a couple of childern at the large barnyard, four to be exact. Outside was a round marsh. The parent went out in the beautiful weather put some charcoal in the grill. Only the parent was able to put it in for the childerns safety. He put some steaks on the grill, when it finished the family sat down and ate it all. The baby sitter came and the parent went out get he's postcard and he was sharp since it was so late. When he got it, he drove back home and slept happly.
Hope this helps your daughter! :D
Answer:
C- The water is cold ,but the sand is warm.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
