Hubris for sure! make sure you retain this one
Answer:
The only feelings and thoughts the narrator can share are his or her own
Explanation:
Answer:
Ok here are my answers...
Explanation:
I would say whatever challenge they have physically or mentally, or what they have to overcome during the story.
It can be internal mostly, because it is something mentally to overcome. External would be Man vs. Man, Man vs. Nature, or maybe Man vs. Society.
The conflict would be when things start to go awry or be more interesting. The sensory details could commit some more drama to the conflict depending on what the conflict is.
I hope this helps. I did not see the narratives that you were talking about, but I did my best. :)
Your question is incomplete because it not does not provide the options to choose from, which are the following:
It misuses a statistic to overstate the amount of crime committed in New York City.
It assumes that because one person commits a crime, others will do so as well.
It uses an incorrect appeal to the New York Police Department as an authority.
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Answer:
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Explanation:
In the passage, the speaker does not mention any other causes which may have lead to the reduction of crime in New York City, such as a rise in employment, education and better quality of life. As a consequence, the speaker takes for granted that the only reason for the decrease of the crime rate is the stop-and-frisk policy, which he or she believes should be continued.
