Answer:
"debris-choked".
Explanation:
In the given passage, the speaker/ author presents the difference between the Glen Canyon and Lake Powell. This contrasting image/ description is made in such a way that the difference is felt and projects a drastic image.
The comparison of these reservoirs is so drastic that the author uses life and death to compare it. While <em>"Glen Canyon was alive. Lake Powell is a graveyard." </em>And the one phrase that best contributes to the author's sad tone is<em> "debris-choked",</em> which presents an image of a place that is dying, or on the verge of death.
People are more likely to learn and practice morality when it is taught to them with kindness.
Please mark as brainliest!
They give you all the explanation I would have in the first paragraph before the questions, so hopefully these examples help! :)
3: The innovation has been amazing since it was done so well, so I have no worries for the future of my house.
4: I am careful where I stored my retainer because my dog might get to, yet I am still worried it may be chewed up.
5: It was beyond my power to help subsidize my brother's business so my mom offered to help, but she could not either.
6: I took a map with me because the edifice was huge, but I somehow got lost still.
Have a nice day!
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)
- Heather
Julie's approach was aimed at showing her positive points about the profession and the way she works. Warren's approach, on the other hand, was to show his strengths and the weaknesses of his competitors.
Although you didn't show the context of your question, it was possible to find a question similar to yours, which showed an exchange of emails between the partners of a law firm, where different partners were interested in working on a specific case. You can see all the emails and the question context in the attached screenshots.
When we read all the emails, we can see that:
- A famous singer being accused and looks for lawyers who can serve him.
- Three lawyers are interested in the case and send emails to the director of the company, showing why they should be chosen.
- Julie, one of the lawyers, shows that she is very interested in the case and that she is a very focused person, that she believes in the client's innocence, and that she has many professional characteristics that are favorable to this case.
- She doesn't say anything about the other lawyers who have an interest in the case.
- Warren, another lawyer interested in the case, takes a different approach. In addition to showing his professional points, he shows what are the negative points of his competitors.
- Furthermore, Warren states that he would like to work on this case, even if he is not chosen to lead the team of lawyers.
With this, we can see that Julie, focused only on the skills she has, while Warren focused on the skills he has and the disadvantages of other candidates.
More information:
brainly.com/question/17343927?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Option A seems the likeliest answer.
Explanation:
Imagery has to do with the visually descriptive words which are used to create a mental image of a setting or a person in the minds of the reader.
We can see that from the list of options, option A best creates a mental image of how the brown cascade rippled down.
The other answer choices were simply narrations without the use of imagery.