Answer:
<em>Water remaining is recaptured by the system.</em>
The second part of this question (<em>You must include an evaluation of YOUR congressional representative with at least TWO specific examples of why you approve or disapprove of his/her performance</em>) is a personal task, and only you can complete it. However, we are able to provide some assistance with the first part.
It is true that Congress typically has a very low public opinion rating, while at the same time people rate their individual representatives highly. The main reason for this is the fact that people tend to think of their individual representatives as personally closer to them.
A person's representative tends to come from the same city or neighbourhood as the voter. Moreover, he tends to campaign in this area. Therefore, the voter is able to see his face, hear his voice and listen to his platform often. This creates a sense of trust and a connection between representative and voter. Moreover, as the voter himself votes the representative in, he is also more likely to be hopeful about his performance. All of these factors lead to people rating their own individual representatives more highly than Congress itself.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
What the people native to Georgia, the Creeks and the Cherokee, might have experienced by living next to the Chattahoochee and across the river from each other could have been a sense of neighbors relationship that included cooperation in some aspects and some differences that really did not affect their relationship.
The Cherokee lived in the Mountains of Northern Georgia and its capital city was New Echota. On the other hand, the Creek lived in Southern Georgia, in the coastal plains and the piedmont. Its capital city was Coweta, close to the river. The Chattahoochee River was the geographical feature that had in common.
No. I don't really care about ranks. I judge an answer based on its rating.
