Answer:
he could have
Explanation:
Judson could have held a thief accountable without harming anyone by informing the local area police who would have conduct investigations to trace and catch the thief additionally in a worst case scenario he would have used a less toxic substance
Answer:
If ur writing it I'm pretty sure it's you dude
Explanation:
Answer: lots of money and fast cars
<span>The claim includes personal pronouns which is disqualified
from being in any argumentative essay. It does state a clear view of what the
claim is, nor does it give information regarding if people should own pets. The
author does absolutely nothing to support his claim, credibly. He supported his
claim with, once again, personal preferences, and does not take a strong stance
on the conclusion clincher. The author concludes to his own liking, and it is
not issued in 3rd person as should be stated. The POV is in error.
The author refuses to place an argumentative bearing on his essay, and
continues in 1st person rather than the preferred 3rd. Transitions
are lacking, and when used, aren’t used correctly. </span>
<span>
</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>Hope this helps! </span>
