"A farmer digs an irrigation ditch to direct river water toward a desert in hopes of transforming it into farmland" descriptions of environmental adaptation strategies is most similar to those practiced by the early Anasazi people.
<u>
Option: B
</u>
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
Anasazi represents the ancient external. Similarly as other cultures throughout the agricultural period, in areas with low rainfall, the Anasazi engaged a large number of techniques to develop great yield crops. Kivas, the great stone reservoirs, was utilized by the Anasazi to preserve domestic and farming water.
Check dams and stone terraces have been used to avoid erosion and permit good agriculture with minimal irrigation or rainfall. Their baskets and ceramics are widely valued by collectors, and are still being generated for exchange by their offspring. However, it's their cliff dwellings that fascinate modern archaeologists, historians, and visitors.
B, Thomas Gibbons was allowed to operate his steamboats in New York.<span>
</span>
Answer:
This question is incomplete. It is missing names and descriptions of the court cases descriptions that are needed to be matched. Here they are (correctly matched):
<em>Tape v. Hurley: </em><em>The California Supreme Court forced San Francisco to admit Chinese students into public schools.
</em>
- This case ended in <u>March 1885</u>, with the Supreme Court decision that refusal to admit a Chinese American student Mamie Tape to the all-white Spring Valley School was unlawful. This was a landmark court case.
<em>United States v. Wong Kim Ark: </em><em>The Supreme Court ruled the Fourteenth Amendment awarded citizenship to children of Chinese immigrants born on American soil.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>March 28, 1898</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco in 1873 to Chinese couple, was unlawfully denied entry to the United States after his trip abroad.
<em>Yick Wo v. Hopkins:</em><em> The U.S. Supreme Court ordered the city of San Francisco to grant licenses to Chinese laundries.
</em>
- This case was decided on <u>May 10, 1886</u>, with the Supreme Court ruling that the administration of law in a discriminating manner is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In particular, here out of 200 applications, only one permit to operate a wooden building laundry was granted to a Chinese owner, while all non-Chinese owners always received permits.
<span>When people had to walk or take a horse this relatively flat trail was the easiest way to get through the mountains. It was also really helpful for those families that had elderly.</span>
