Answer:
<em><u>In store promotion</u></em>
Explanation:
Brenda was planning a small dinner party and had gone to a new specialty food store with coupons he'd found in the food section of the paper. At the store she also found a buy one , get one free deal and a gift offered with the purchase of a particular dessert . She altered the menu as a result of the <em><u>promotion in store</u></em> and ended up spending less than she'd planned.
Promotion in sale is good tactic used bu the sores to increase their sales . Store's promotion attract people and they intend or desire to buy the product.It always helps the customer to remove their dissatisfaction as they can even physical touch the product and can know about the quality of the product . It builds a strong connection between the seller and the buyer. It helps i creating the brand loyalty . It helps in creating a good product image of the product in the mind of the the buyers.
Answer:
$8.20 per pound
Explanation:
The computation of the actual price per pound is shown below:
Material price variance = (Standard price per pound - Actual price per pound) × Actual quantity purchased
-$7,000 = ($8.00 - Actual price per pound) × 35,000
$8.00 - Actual price per pound = -$7,000 ÷ 35,000
Actual price per pound = $8.20 per pound
Hence, the actual price per pound is $8.20 per pound
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
The Beta is 1
The required return increases to 13%
Explanation:
The formula for required return is given below:
Required Return = Risk-Free Rate of Return + β(Market Return – Risk-Free Rate of Return)
required return is 11%
risk-free rate of return=7%
Beta is unknown
market return-risk free rate of return is market risk premium is 4%
11%=7%+beta(4%)
11%-7%=beta*4%
4%=beta*4%
beta=4%/4%
beta=1
If the market risk premium increased to 6%,required return is calculated thus:
required return=7%+1(6%)
required return =13%
This implies that the riskier the stock, the higher the market risk premium, the higher the required return to investors.
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Dividend, D0 =$1.20
Price, P0 = $50.00
Growth rate, g = 6% (constant)
Based on the DCF approach, then
Cost of Equity:
= [D0 × (1 + g) ÷ P0] + g
= [(1.20 × (1 + 0.06)) ÷ 50] + 0.06
= (1.272 ÷ 50) + 0.06
= 0.02544 + 0.06
= 0.08544 or 8.54%
Hence, the cost of equity from retained earnings is 8.54%.
Answer:
Follows are the responses to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
Yeah, throughout the state court they will ever sue against fraud. As base with the that State is appropriate so because the main place of work is specific budget inventory representatives Inc.
In point b:
Thomas couldn't sue for cheating at the federal court successfully, because equality in nationality would be the only conceivable way. Because as a federal problem also isn't involved, Thomas and both are comprehensive residents of Michigan weren’t diverse for this situation. The business is a resident of all its corporate headquarters and the State of formation.
In point c:
Throughout this situation, silver can claim nationality plurality, as Oklahoma's comprehensive would not be a citizen. It simple company does company in such a state doesn't render that business a citizen. However, if silver has been damaged in terms of $75,000, this failure combined with citizenship diversity would allow it to sue extensively in a federal court. This event does not tell everyone how slowly he lost, however, the facts weren't enough to make a correct judgment.
