To illustrate that the list that McCandless had made was supported by actions as well as words, as shown in option D.
<h3>What is the effect of this description?</h3>
- It increases the reader's feelings about the characters' intentions.
- It optimizes the understanding of McCandess' image.
- Characterizes the characters indirectly.
When Krakauer describes McCandless's image of himself, he promotes a greater understanding of McCandless's list and shows himself as a character who likes to analyze the actions of others very accurately. It also shows that McCandless is a very proactive character who speaks and acts on his words.
This attitude is efficient to explain the characters and indirectly characterizes them.
Learn more about indirect characterization:
brainly.com/question/12003614
#SPJ1
Answer:
He makes a concession about imperialism, showing both sides of the argument.
He uses an appeal to emotion with words like honor and sacrifice to stir nationalism.
He cites evidence of winning the recent war to show that people still sacrifice for the empire.
Explanation:
Joseph Chamberlain presents his argument with emotions, evidence and logic. He presents the picture of both sides of the argument and builds a thinking among the audience about imperialism. He also tries to bring emotion and encourage the sense of nationalism among the audience. The use of certain words helps him to make his argument more appealing to the audience. He also had provided the example of sacrifice from the people's end that had brought good results in the past. By doing so he presents his argument with more zeal and appeal.
Answer:
normally pandas have 2 but one usually dies
Explanation:
A metaphor is <span>a phrase which is applied to an object or action that can't be literally applicable. So the answer would be C. </span>