The answer you are looking for would be D. Hope this helps!
The big difference is that today's judgments have a legal rite. People should be judged with dignity, which was not always the case at that time, and condemnation must be evidence-based, which was not always respected either.
Another difference is that today there is no judgment based on supernatural situations, as was the case of the Witches of Salem. For a judgment made under the aegis of democracy, crime must have motives that can be substantiated. Finally, people who are tried today have a broad right of defense, which was not the case in the Middle Ages.
<span>Prior to WW2, America had an isolationist foreign policy. It never joined the League of Nations, and staunchly avoided taking side with any colonialist power.
Anyway, America's priority at the time was to tackle the depression (which saw unemployment rose to 25%). On the whole the American population and their politicians were totally ignorant or blindsided to the frighten events in Germany and Japan, until it was too late for the countries invaded by the Axis aggressors.</span>
President Kennedy’s policy of “flexible response” differed from Eisenhower’s New Look Policy in that "<span>(B) it allowed for a response to a wider spectrum of warfare," since the Kennedy Administration believed that the "New Look Policy" was too restricted in its methods of retaliation. </span><span />
Answer:
You need to explain this more and I can answer your question.
