A Mutation in one of an individual's somatic cells will not be passed onto the offspring.
Answer:
Law of Independent assortment
Explanation:
Gregor Mendel, who was regarded the father of Genetics, discovered principles that governs inheritance in his experiments. He discovered that the alleles of a gene will separate into gametes when he performed a crossed involving a single gene or character like height, pea color etc. He proposed his law of segregation based on this.
However, he considered two characters or genes in his cross, which he called a DIHYBRID cross. He discovered that the alleles of each different gene separates into gametes independently of one another i.e. without one gene influencing the other in each gamete. He called this principle his LAW OF INDEPENDENT ASSORTMENT.
He obtained a 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio for the F2 dihybrid offsprings which is only possible if each gamete equally likely contains two alleles of the two different genes in different combinations.
A: Incomplete dominance!
Incomplete dominance is when a dominant allele doesn’t completely mask the effects of the other. The organism, as a result, will show a blending of both.
OPTIONS:
a. When there are just two other people at the party.
b. When everyone is wearing a nametag.
c. When there are more than 50 people attending the same party.
d. When the need for help from the person who is having a heart attack is very clear
Answer:
c. When there are more than 50 people attending the same party.
Explanation:
Bystander effect is a term used in social psychology to describe the tendency of an individual to intervene in the event of an emergency to offer help to the person needing it, when others are present at the scene of the emergency.
In the case of an emergency just like the scenario stated in the question, where someone develops a heart attack at a dance party, if the party has more people, the slimmer the chance of the person getting help from any of the 50 people at the party, as the presence of others would tend to discourage the any individual from attempting to help the victim having the heart attack.
The situation that would more likely show the bystander intervention effect is <em>"c. When there are more than 50 people attending the same party."</em>
