Answer:
The boss is correct.
Explanation:
Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a rules-based approach to corporate governance and reporting is used. It is based on the view that companies must be
required by law (or by some other form of compulsory regulation) to comply with established principles of good corporate governance.
Except in the instances of exceptions provided in the act, company has no choice than to comply regardless of the cost implication because non-compliance is punishable under the act. Sometimes, it is called tick box approach
This is contrary to what is obtainable in a principled-based approach where allowance is given for explanation in the event of possible con-compliance.
Given its current stock price the dividend yield would be 42.39%.
Given,
Digby is paying a dividend of $19. 67 (per share)
Dividend were raised by $3. 64
Dividend yield = Dividend per share / Market price per share.
As there is no share price given, I shall assume that the share price is $100. The new share price will be:
= 100 * (1 + $3. 64)
= $464
The Dividend yield would then become:
= 19.67 / 464
= 42.39%
The dividend yield will be calculated on the basis of the dividend per share divided by the market price per share and this will be calculated on the basis of the percentage.
To learn more about dividend yield here:
brainly.com/question/18687546
#SPJ4
Answer:
preferential trade agreement
Explanation:
This agreement is known as a preferential trade agreement. It is called this because it tends to make it easier for specific goods to be traded but only to the countries that are part of the group and/or agreement. This agreement also makes it harder for countries that are not part of the agreement to be able to trade with the countries that are in order to maintain the countries within the agreement trading with each other.
Answer:
Revision/Review
Explanation:
DRP is a key procedure in every company so the documentation must be reviewed usually and updated accordignly.
Answer:
conceptualized
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario Scott has conceptualized the concept of "minority owned". This term refers to when an individual creates an abstract but very simplified view of something. Which in this case he gave the term "minority owned" a simplified definition of being only owned by women or African Americans, when there can be many other minorities in a certain area.
