Answer:
i think its C but im not sure
Answer:
Option D (Sedition Act) would be the correct approach.
Explanation:
- The above Sedition act, 1918, has been the statute that rendered opposing the administration another misdemeanor.
- Such utilization of some kind of mendacious, peculiar, as well as violent terminology, would be further forbidden. The statute also became concerned with several other punitive clauses.
The other alternative is not linked to something like the procedure outlined. So the alternative above is the right one.
Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
Answer:
chart c i got it right on a test
hope i helped
Explanation:
