Is broken bar a graph?

Blank are people who choose to move because they want to pursue opportunities in new areas or who are forced to leave to avoid p

pashok25 [27]

Migrants

-- a person who moves from one place to another, especially in order to find work or better living conditions.

6 0

3 years ago

which of the following is true of the Japanese invasion of china ad attack of the city of Nanjing in 1937

juin [17]

Answer:

he Nanking Massacre took place over a period of six weeks in 1937, when the ... both soldiers and civilians–in the Chinese city of Nanking (or Nanjing). ... Following a bloody victory in Shanghai during the Sino-Japanese War, the ... Fearful of losing them in battle, Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-Shek ...

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What accounts for the success of absolutism in some parts of Europe and its failure

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. And this reality could be social, political or religious.

Explanation:

I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.

France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. The question is: why this conception worked in France? Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.
On the contrary, in England, the king was subjected to the Parlament. However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). This idea attests that a king has duties with its people, and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.