Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
Is this a true or false? if so, it is false because martin luther king did not believe in violence. he believed in peaceful protests
Answer:
1 : control and direction of public business (as of a city or a nation) The mayor makes decisions regarding the government of city departments. 2 : a system of control : an established form of political rule a democratic government. 3 : the people making up a governing body Their governments are committed to peace.
Answer:
because it was built in different time periods, some parts of the great wall are more decayed then others.
that is only one reason, there are many more reasons as well.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Britain,France and the United States embrace the policy of appeasement because they believed that Hitler demands would stop any future pursuits of territories.
Explanation:
