<span>Britain was technically allied with Denmark but couldn't bring itself to get involved in a protracted war with Prussia. Much drama ensued from Britain 'abandoning' their friends the Danes.</span>
Answer:
The technological and industrial history of the United States describes the United States' emergence as one of the most technologically advanced nations in the world. The availability of land and literate labor, the absence of a landed aristocracy, the prestige of entrepreneurship, the diversity of climate and large easily accessed upscale and literate markets all contributed to America's rapid industrialization. The availability of capital, development by the free market of navigable rivers and coastal waterways, as well as the abundance of natural resources facilitated the cheap extraction of energy all contributed to America's rapid industrialization. Fast transport by the very large railroad built in the mid-19th century, and the Interstate Highway System built in the late 20th century, enlarged the markets and reduced shipping and production costs. The legal system facilitated business operations and guaranteed contracts. Cut off from Europe by the embargo and the British blockade in the War of 1812 (1807–15), entrepreneurs opened factories in the Northeast that set the stage for rapid industrialization modeled on British innovations.
Answer:
I have a feeling its D. I tried to search it but it seems that it wouldnt tell me. Im sorry if this was wrong. im was really trying to help.
I think it was because there were too many immigrants coming in and taking our jobs, and American decided figure out what was an actual American, (so like the first settlers), and the immigrants weren't
"American" I actually think they limited china on how many people could come into the US and then after so many people came they cut them off, and then the Chinese who wanted to come to America would have to wait until next year. But then they considered that un American I guess unconstitonal is the word and then undid that law. I hope this helps.
Although this is slightly subjective, most historians agree that yes--it is true that <span>Jefferson's "Revolution of 1800" was not as much of a revolution as he thought, since in fact a Hamiltonian perspective ultimately ended up prevailing in American politics. </span>
