I think it is the three-fifths compromise.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, I don't think that any of these industries are morally wrong?
As the passage in the Bible says: "the one who is not guilty of nothing can throw the first rock," which menas that nobody has granted us the right to judge.
It is true that there are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include rodeos, horse racing, circuses, hunting,
Many of these companies do not have the proper facilities or the proper care for animals. But that is not the case of all.
Although this is a controversial issue, some of these companies take care of animals and employ hundreds of people that support their families and pay taxes. Furthermore, they fulfill an important function in the entertainment industry.
So my suggestion would be that federal and state regulations could be more strict to protect animals, by closing those industries is not the better option.
THE ANSWER is C because theres always two sides especially in politics. For example during the past election, there was two main Republican and Democratic news station reporting with their own biased points.
The Legacy of the Safavid Empire. ... The Safavid Empire's life span was only about 200 years, compared to the Ottoman Empire, which lasted about 600 years. Religion. The Safavid Empire revolutionized the Shi'a sect of Islam and helped it grow to being about equal to the then predominant Sunni sect.
