1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PIT_PIT [208]
4 years ago
8

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST) What was the argument in the dred Scott case?

History
2 answers:
Marat540 [252]4 years ago
8 0

B

i thought it was a choose twoi lol

Vinvika [58]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B) dred should have been free because he had lived in a free territory

Explanation:

The Dred Scott decision was the Supreme Court's ruling on the sixth of March, 1857, that living in a free state and on territory did not entitle a slave, Dred Scott, to his freedom. the decision argued that as a slave Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court.

You might be interested in
As Europeans moved to New Zealand, the Maori began to see themselves as _____.
jek_recluse [69]

B. a nation

The advent of Europeans to New Zealand commenced in the 17th century, caused tremendous advances to the Maori style of life. Maori people increasingly embraced many features of American culture and civilization. Fundamental relationships among Maori and Westerners were considerably friendly, and by the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840, the two societies accompanied as a component of a new British settlement.

5 0
4 years ago
The U.S. supported Ferdinand Marcos, a dictator in the Philippines, because
malfutka [58]
The answer is: a. he was anticommunist.

8 0
3 years ago
What was a priority of the
zhuklara [117]

Answer: b

Explanation: The federal governments main goal to help westward expansion was the homestead act and the construction of the transcontinental railroad.

6 0
3 years ago
Unlike conflicts in Egypt and Syria, the conflict in the Byzantine territory of Anatolia was quickly settled. resulted in many d
kupik [55]
Unlike conflicts in Egypt and Syria, the conflict in the Byzantine territory of Anatolia was quickly "settled". Although it should be noted that of course "settled" is a relative term here. 
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were mongols different
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

This questions vague but I'll try my best to answer: Mongols were different from others because they were a number of nomadic tribes united under a single banner by Genghis Khan, who conquered northern China. Mongols were also different because the Mongol army was primarily made up of soldiers who rode on horseback and carried composite bows.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is Freedom of the Press in America today out of control? Explain your reasoning.
    12·1 answer
  • Which contributed to Hitler’s rise to power in Germany?
    10·2 answers
  • The study of history does all of the following except:
    5·1 answer
  • Why were the colonists angry about the stamp act
    6·1 answer
  • The Treaty of _____,signed in 1783,made americans independence official.
    11·1 answer
  • The 13th amendment was an extension of the policy begun by ?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains how the invention of paper affected Chinese civilization?
    6·1 answer
  • What is El Nino? and how does it affect the weather?
    6·1 answer
  • What factors prompted European exploration?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the Confederacy attack Fort Sumter?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!