1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wariber [46]
3 years ago
12

What challenges did the Hebrews face when they first settled in Canaan? Choose three answers.

History
2 answers:
JulsSmile [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a,b,c

Explanation:

I took the quiz on ED and I got 100%

Lynna [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Drought

Explanation:

  • The territory of southern Levant included resent day Gaza, West bank and southern regions of Lebanon and Syria. It was earlier known as Canaan.
  • The Israelite settled in Canaan in about 1250.
  • When the drought affected Canaan, the Hebrews came to Egypt and begged for grain. Joseph ignored their past mistreatment of him and gave them food grain and asked them to stay in Egypt. The Hebrews stayed in Egypt and prospered.  
You might be interested in
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
What was a result of the Six-Day War?
Nutka1998 [239]
Israel seized control of the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt, the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. Hope that helped !
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the 1840s, why did so many German people move to the United States?
ch4aika [34]

Answer:

To escape economic hardships

Explanation:

In the decade from 1845 to 1855, more than a million Germans fled to the United States to escape economic hardship. They also sought to escape the political unrest caused by riots, rebellion and eventually a revolution in 1848.

Hopefully this helped :3

3 0
3 years ago
Why did poniac want the native americans to join forces?
Arlecino [84]
The Pontiacs had the Native Americans under the chief Ottawa to attack the British force at Detroit. But they failed. Though that didn't stop them from trying again. So every Indian tribe for Lake Superior to the lower Mississippi for a joint campaign to eliminate the British. 
3 0
3 years ago
PLS I NEED THE ANSWER I GIVE U 100 POINTS IF U ANWSER
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

The UDHR or Universal Declaration of Human rights had the trigger for its codification in the aftermath of the Second World War, as a way for states all over the world to collectively avoid such atrocities and for suffering on a global scale from ever happening again. So yes

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How are Hammurabi's Code and Chinese Confucianism similar?
    5·1 answer
  • Under a system of doing federalism conflicts between state laws and federal laws are______. A inconsequential B common C unconst
    7·1 answer
  • hy was the time period around the administration of James Monroe called “The Era of Good Feelings”? a) Americans were thrilled t
    13·1 answer
  • In which way did the removal of Native American lands affect the native people
    10·1 answer
  • Which battle represents the first Union victory in the Civil War?
    5·1 answer
  • According to Jackson, what is required of the national government for it to "be worth defending"?
    9·2 answers
  • What did african americans first control after the civil war?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did most of the immigrants who came to America in the late 19th century settle in the cities?
    6·2 answers
  • When was the constitution made?
    14·1 answer
  • What Happened to Hitler as the Soviet in the allied forces move in on Berlin?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!