I believe it is B, but i am not 100% sure.
Answer:
To fully understand the subject and content of the art, one should look into the complex background of the piece – who is the artists, in what time and place was the art produced, what was the inspiration, what is the movement it belongs to, etc. Therefore, understanding of the art piece is problematic in the sense that it is complex and can’t be reduced to only the one artwork itself. One who accesses the art needs to always have the full information about its circumstances of making.
Explanation:
<u>The problem of understanding art and its purpose lies in the fact that</u><u> art is often complex</u><u> and to understand it </u><u>we must have a piece of background information about the artist, the time he belonged in, and the theme of the piece.</u>
<u>We need to read every art piece in the context of its own time and movement</u>. Understanding the theme of the impressionist piece is not the same as understanding the one on the cubist work. For example, we have to know that to look into impressionistic painting we have to move away, observe the movements of light and brush, as this was the main focus of the artists of the time. Additionally, impressionism has often portrayed everyday scenes, nature, and the simple life of people. Cubist work, however, is better-observed piece by piece – it is composed of various perspectives of the same subjects, but reduced to geometrical shapes and constructs. Cubism was also more dedicated to portraying modern life and was more likely to give commentary on it (e.g. Guernica by Picasso).
Art is also rather dependents on its <u>technique </u>– we do not analyze oil paintings the same way we do drawings. All techniques have their ideas and benefits, they all try to convey different atmosphere and idea.
<u>The artist himself or herself plays a major role in the piece itself,</u> and often understanding of the subject includes looking into the background of the artist’s life. We should see where they got their information, who they were emotionally, and how they conveyed their life into the art.
Hi there!
There are 7 elements of art, and 8 principles of art. There are really a lot of different ways you can find them in this painting!
First, what stands out to me the most, and probably you as well, is the color. The different hues and intensities really make up this art work. With that being said- these colors are all cool toned, contributing to the interpretation of this painting. Most likely included to give a calming and/or soothing feel. Next, I would include form. Form is the element of 3D and volume. You can tell how this is used by the beams or pillars in the background of the art to give an enclosed type feel around the flowers. Last is harmony. This principle is arguably one of the most important. It allows each element/ principle to work smoothly together in order to achieve similarity and highlight accents.
Sorry this was so long, but hope it helped! :)
The characteristics of artwork in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries are such that they can be described as:
- representational
- abstract
- non-objective
- experimental
<h3>How was art like in the twentieth and twenty-first century?</h3>
Art underwent some extensive changes in the twentieth century as the world became more liberal in all aspects.
Artists became prominent in the century for coming up and continuing daring art styles such as abstract and non-objective art.
As we went into the twenty-first century, the ever widening boundaries of art continued to increase such that representation and experimental art and now quite popular as well.
In conclusion, all the art styles are found in the twentieth and twenty-first century.
Find out more on twentieth century art at brainly.com/question/12419091
#SPJ1