A. Religious ceremonies because religion didn't come until 3200 BCE and the neolithic revolution was around 10000 BC
It seems to me as if somewhere along the road, these Enlightenment ideas were in a way corrupted.<span> </span>The killing of the King is understandable because he is a symbol of the old way of government. Even killing the highest, most elite of the government was understandable. But killing every last government associate and even priests seems like a very noticeable turn from the traditional Enlightenment philosophies of Jean-Jacques and Voltaire.
The columbian exchange also traded slaves. A lot of them going into Brazil and into the Caribbean but not yet into the 13 British colonies. This was caused my the demand of raw materials like sugar and caused the increase of population growth in Europe as well as the development of the plantation system in America. Furthermore the columbian exchange as far as slave trade would lead to the plantation system and population increase because of a a high demand
Inca society was rather complex, social classes were markly stated but there were many subtle difference from one to the other. In this middle part of the social structure, there were the <em>Curacas</em> or local leaders of defeated tribes, the tax collectors and the artisans. None of them were considered noble or high class, but they also had better status and rights that the Commoners.
