Who gained control of lands east of the Mississippi River as a result of the French and Indian War?

2 answers:

8 0

That would be the french because the indians didnt have the weaponry to fend for themselves therefor they could not win.

balandron [24]3 years ago

8 0

<span>The war resulted in the French loss of all French possessions in North America except for some Caribbean islands and Saint Pierre and Miquelon, two small islands off Newfoundland. The British acquired Canada while the Spanish gained Louisiana in compensation for its loss of Florida to the British. The result of the war is that Britain acquired a large Francophone population in Quebec and, near the beginning of the war in 1755, expelled French speaking populations in Acadia to Louisiana, creating the Cajun population.</span>

You might be interested in

2) True or False:

sergejj [24]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Growing Plants can help you out with this too, I only know cause years ago i took this quiz and it was true!

No Problem and I hope you Pass :D

7 0

3 years ago

Jeffrey is writing a paper on civic responsibility for his AP American History class, and he wants to separate his

Alexxx [7]

Answer:

i believe its b

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

French soldiers brought home American ideas about government and rights, including news of the Declaration of Independence. One

Paraphin [41]

Rousseau is your answer :)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

describe the different views between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist regarding the Constitution and its ratification. needs t

jasenka [17]

Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.

8 0

3 years ago

How did Transcontinental railroad spur Western settlement

Semmy [17]

" It carried the natural resources of the West-minerals, timber, crops, and cattle-to eastern markets. In turn, trains brought miners, ranchers, and farmers west to develop these resources further. "
Source : jiskha.com

Hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago