Answer:
If your options are:
A. The poem uses variations of meter to affect rhyme.
B. The poem’s sentences flow across stanzas.
C. The poem’s stanzas have varying lengths.
D. The poem uses nontraditional syntax and rhyme scheme.
Then the answer is D.
Explanation:
The nontraditional syntax is best shown in the use of enjambment - interrupting the thought and syntactic structure in the middle and moving the rest to the next line. For example: "and older than the // flow of human blood (...)"
Here, the definite article "the" has been separated from the noun "flow", which means the phrase is visually broken in half.
- A isn't true because this poem conveys its meaning through rhythm and not rhyme. There are virtually no rhymes here and the syntax (sentence structure) is disrupted, invoking the sound of a river flowing in irregular but consistent waves.
- B isn't true because the sentences do flow across lines but not across stanzas.
- The stanzas do have varying lengths. But even though this element was pretty rare prior to the 20th century, it is not exclusive to modernist poetry. That's why C isn't true either.
I believe that it is "C. Minor supporting detail" But I still have some doubts, so it may be "B. Major supporting detail"
Answer:
Mutations in plants or animals are referred to as Deviations, which are immediately destroyed once they are discovered. A human with a genetic mutation is labeled a Blasphemy and sent to the Fringes of society, where they struggle to survive among other individuals with mutations or deformities.
If not mistaken
Hope this helped:)
The correct answer is "The narrator mocks the narrative style of epic poetry by applying it to a beast fable."
Explanation:
It's a type of hyperbole to mock.
Hope this helps :)
