Answer:
Nuclear Station (If its an object a nuclear weapon)
Explanation:
It may show people in 3021 about our weapons and this can be seen by some after effects such as thermal radiation. Unlike conventional explosions, a single nuclear explosion can generate an intense pulse of thermal radiation that can start fires and burn skin over large areas. In some cases, the fires ignited by the explosion can coalesce into a firestorm, preventing the escape of survivors.
There are other affects such as damage to the ozone layer. In addition, the ozone layer, which protects the surface of the Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation, would be depleted by 40% over many inhabited areas and up to 70% at the poles.
New evidence is discovered & Oversights and errors are corrected
Thats what i personally think because new opinions have to be backed with evidence, while if a piece of evidence is lost or stolen, it doesn't change the arguments because even though it is lost or stolen, there ought to be copies of the original object, but im not sure about new technology being applied to evidence, but it can go either or, its a 50/50 because new technology can enhance historical discoveries, or find new ones, but applying new technology as evidence has to be backed up with facts as to why it should be applied
Some colonists became skilled craftsmen in the Middle Colonies because it ended up not being enough open farm land for everyone to farm and there was, at that time, not enough of other trades so instead of farming, they went to craftsmanship. Most of the farm land was also covered with a lot of forestry and at the time, tree removal was a very long and lengthy process; this meant that land would open up at a painfully slow pace. Basically, they didn't have much of an option to go to other avenues to make money.
B) Black nationalism
Malcolm X advocated for even violent self defense for African Americans in crisis.
This is a very tough theme, and the main reason for that is the perception, will it be by modern standards, or for the standards of the time when it happened. The way the Native Americans were treated by the American government was terrible in general. They were segregated, didn't had lot of the rights that the white settlers had, lost their lands, were forced to migrate, lot of them were killed etc. All of this by modern standards will fall into the category of violation of the human rights, and the American government leaders would have been convicted for crimes against the humanity. But this didn't happened in modern times, but instead it happened in a period where the people were still constantly in war with each other, conquering or loss of territory was a common thing, and basically it was the law of nature prevailing that only the strongest and fittest will survive. Also, it has to be taken in consideration that it is not only the American government that took land away from the Native Americas, but the different tribes were very often in war with each other, and they were conquering and taking over lands from each other, so by that logic they should be condemned as well, as it is the same principle.
