Logical because you are trying to show what makes the most sense. In this case what is the most logical.
The correct answer is A. They must allow Hitler to believe he has defeated them, and then attack.
They had to reform the Red Army and the Russian air force.
They used camouflage, surprise and misinformation to keep the German army in the dark about their intentions. The retreated Soviets were ordered by Stalin to leave nothing the Germans could use, this was called a <em>scorched-earth </em>policy.
I dont really know bdhshdhdhbdbsbbsbzhdhxhhxhxhxhxhxhbxbxhxjxjxn dbdbd xbd d
Answer:
Explanation: Crucially, positive discrimination allows an employer to pick a candidate specifically on the basis of their protected characteristic, whereas a company can only evoke positive action when choosing who to hire or promote “if it is faced with two candidates who are 'as qualified as' each other”, says free-access HR
<span>
B. We are going to pick the peppers</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>As you may
know, an independent clause is basically a clause that is a complete sentence
(or the portion of a clause that can stand on its own. Of all the possible responses, and with that
mind, the only option that contains a complete thought is “B. We are going to
pick the peppers.” The first option, “A,”
could be a bit misleading because it kind of looks like a complete sentence,
but it leaves things hanging. “We are
going to…” Well, we are going to
what? In the future, when trying to
determine which clause within a sentence is an independent clause, be on the
lookout for which clause is a complete thought and can stand on its own making
the most sense. </span>