Farming allowed people to control the amount of crops they could get after harvesting and it can also control how many people could live in the area for smaller and more spread out societies. I hope this helped!
The major difference between Leutchtenburg's and Interrante's interpretations of cities and rural areas during the 1920s was the geographical reorganization of rural and urban areas. The regions were drawn together and a more independent relationship between them. The relationship was evident in towns and cities which outlined difference around urban centres.
The towns attracted people from the surrounding countryside and central cities. Farm families which were converted to surrounding countryside were tied to urban culture and urban market. People habits of consumption were charged by shifting from direct production of goods to be purchasing them markets of metropolitan and this made women go to the marketplace and come out of the household.
<span>For this question, let's just use your example of trader. Now our definition of trader would be the kind of trader that is also a merchant from the past era and not day trader as in a stock trader. Basically, a trader exchanges goods for money or any other form of monetary object. Now a trader can greatly contribute to the economic welfare of the city because he provides goods and services to the people of the city. He will receive money from the people in which he will have to pay taxes which can help contribute to the development of the city. </span>
It is JSOC who is charged with the responsibility of studying special operations
