Answer:
I would say B. It will be 5-9 sentences.
The description that best defines revisiting when paraphrasing is that we should set the source aside to check if we haven't copied the author's words.
<h3>What is a paraphrase?</h3>
When we paraphrase something, we repeat someone else's ideas using different words. One way to check if we have correctly paraphrased something is by revisiting the original source.
Revisiting means setting the source aside and then checking it again to see if we were able to truly paraphrase the idea, if we haven't just copied the author's words.
Learn more about paraphrase here:
brainly.com/question/24729251
#SPJ1
Answer:
I am Not sure of the answer to this .
Explanation:
I am Not sure of this one either
Answer:
B
Explanation:
It really depends on what was underlined. There are two possibilities.
- I think that not a single peace loving State could decline a peace treaty with a neighboring State even though the latter was headed by such fiends and cannibals as Hitler and Ribbentrop.
- Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It was such a pact that Germany proposed to us in 1939.
The first one is irony of the highest order. Though Stalin was correct in his assessment of Hitler and Ribbentrop, he didn't include himself (who may have been the worst of the three), in his description.
The second one is just a definition of what a non-aggression pact was.
I would pick B. The real problem is what is underlined. B is the truth. It was actually Hitler's plan to invade Russia long before it happened. Not only that, he was so confident of victory that he did not order his textile industry to make protective clothing when he did invade Russia. He thought it would be over in Russia long before such clothing was needed.
