Which of the following most contributed to the decline of the ranching industry in the late 1880s?

1 answer:

3 0

The answer would be : ranchers' refusal to use technology. During the late 1880s, the technologies began to rapidly developed within the industry. But back then, a lot of ranchers are really comfortable in using traditional ways (using slaves) and they refuse to use technology

You might be interested in

1. The Allies landed 175,000 troops at Normandy the first night. About 10.700

lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

Humans began to work with and occasionally against their environment to create a stable way to acquire food as well as a more stable lifestyle. On the other hand, the environment, the climate in particular, definitely dictated the movement and survival methods of early humans.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Public reaction to The Jungle contributed to which of the following government actions? (3 points)

harina [27]

The answer to the question above is the first option: regulation of the meatpacking industry. "The Jungle" is actually a novel that was written by <span>Upton Sinclair who happens to be a journalist and a novelist too. This novel was written in order to show how the lives of those immigrants in the United States are being exploited. But what this novel also focused on is the unsanitary practices that were done by American meatpacking industry and how this violates any health regulations during the 20th century. This brought the regulation of Meat Inspection Act. </span>

6 0

3 years ago

Explain why the Manchu dynasty accepted Dutch traders and not the British

malfutka [58]

The dutch accepted china's restrictions on trade; the british didn't. british refused to preform the "kowtow" ritual

3 0

3 years ago

What was the goal of the leaders who met at the Congress of Vienna in 1815? (During Mexican revolution)

inessss [21]

Answer: The goal of these leaders in 1815 was to create balance and prevent future wars with Europe (France, Britain, Spain,etc.)

8 0

3 years ago

WHO IS GOOD A HISTORY AND CAN DO THIS NO PLAGIARIZING IF YOU DO NOT PLAGIARIZE AND MAKE A GOOD ANSWER I WILL GIVE YOU THE BRAINL

Korolek [52]

Answer:

Many empires rose and fell between 2300 B.C. & 334 B.C. This includes the Babylonian and Hittite Empires which were located near the Middle East. The Babylonian Empire was found particularly in between two rivers, the Euphrates and Tigris, but also stretched to include Present-day Palestine, Present-day & Ancient Israel, North-east of Egypt, and terminating at the ancient city of Ur. The Hittite Empire, on the other hand, included most of present-day Turkey down to present-day northern border of Israel. In comparing both of the empires, we can see that they were able to conquer areas of their surrounding.

However, there are extreme differences between the two empires. One can be savage, in that they continued to war and pillage other civilizations. The Hittite empire fell apart during the rise of the Assryian Kingdom, which effectively removed the "staff of power" from the Hittite's, as well as suppress Babylon.

The Babylonian Empire, on the other hand, rose after the fall of the Assryian Empire, and was able to conquer most of what the Hittite's had. They ruled Northern Egypt, present-day Israel and Palestine, up to what would later be known as Constantinople, and going down to the Persian Gulf. The Babylonians were conquerors, who defeated and assimilated the people groups into the empire, though displacing them to discourage rebellion. They were overthrown later on by the Persians at the end of their empire.

Babylon and the Hittite were similar only in that they became empires, but the differences are great. They both took different approaches in trying to conquer the lands. One tried suppression, while the other did assimilation (though they did have to suppress in numerous occasions). In the end, they both were empires, and they both fell.

Explanation:

Man I hope you mark it as brainliest

7 0

2 years ago