Answer:
11.07%
Explanation:
The formula to compute WACC is shown below:
= Weightage of debt × cost of debt × ( 1- tax rate) + (Weightage of common stock) × (cost of common stock)
= (0.25 × 8%) × ( 1 - 34%) + (0.75 × 13%)
= 1.32% + 9.75%
= 11.07%
We simply multiply the weighatge with its capital structure so that the correct weightage cost of capital can come.
Answer:
most likely will not be held responsible because of the business judgment rule.
Explanation:
A business judgement rule is a legal provision that protects the board of a company from frivolous legal actions as flregards its business decisions.
Boards of companies are assumed to act in good faith, within their fiduciary standards of loyalty, prudence and care that the board owes to shareholders.
It will have to be proven that the board blatantly violated a code of conduct, otherwise the court will review or question it's decisions.
I think the answer is D, but I may be wrong. The reason why is Shaila needs PowerPoint to check her grades to ease all the work.She may just add it into the main tabs.
Answer:
a per se violation of antitrust law.
Explanation:
The antitrust laws can be defined as those laws that are created by the US government to protect consumers from unfair means of competition in market. The aim of creating such laws is to ensure the protection of customers from corruptive business practices and also to ensure safe healthy competitive environment among same business companies.
<u>In the given scenario, the Association of Organic Food Growers is violating the antitrust law by boycotting farmers, ranchers, etc. The antitrust laws are violated by companies in several ways among them is by boycotting</u>.
Boycotting can be defined as an agreement between several companies that excludes a group of customers or market to avert them from buying aanyy goods or products.
This boycotting agreement is a per se violation of antitrust law.
Answer:
Voidable Contract
Explanation:
Voidable Contract
This is a type of contract or legal agreement in which any of the parties involved or the both parties may chose to render it unenforceable for a given number of reasons. This type us different from a void contract in that, it is a valid contract which may either be affirmed or rejected by both or either parties.
Some reasons that may lead to the withdrawal of the contract are misinterpretation, coercion and fraud etc.
It is a valid contract that can be declared invalid. It is different from VOID as earlier pointed out as a void contract cannot be enforced by either party. Examples of voidable contract are found in real estate contract, lawyer contract and so on.
