Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
Answer:
Russia
Explanation:
Czar Nicholas II became the ruler of Russia in 1894. However, following his incompetence and heavy losses in the wars he entered in his bid to maintain autocracy such as the Russo-Japanese war in 1905.
The effect led to many things in Russia, such as a scarcity of food, striking of labors, the level of poverty also increased tremendously and the soldiers were tired of unsuccessful war.
He was later removed from his position in 1914.
Spanish and European settlers bout decease and cattle
Answer:
the last one
Explanation:
I think that's the answer because it was the first democratic government in America.
Explanation:
I think it's simple and easier to learn
