Scotland is suffering under Macbeth's rule. He illegally became king by murdering the previous king, Duncan. Once he started his reign, he changed completely - he used to be an honorable warrior, but his ambition corrupted him, and he became a tyrant once he assumed the throne. During his reign, people in Scotland were afraid all the time about what their new king might do, and his own country was suffering.
This is what Malcolm had to say about Macbeth's rule, which testifies to his terrible reign:
<em>"I think our country sinks beneath the yoke.
</em><em>It weeps, it bleeds, and each new day a gash
</em><em>Is added to her wounds."</em>
I'd say option B, because that is how the story or the main problem was "resolved" (as the phrase suggests) or taken care of.
The term chronological actually means that the facts are arranged in ascending order.
Answer:
They deal with the snake conflict in a very calm and controlled manner.
Explanation:
"The dinner party" written by Mona Gardner is a short story about a dinner with men and women, where men claim that women do not have the same emotional control as men and that at the slightest sign of danger they start screaming. Although the women present disagree, the men continue to defend this argument. At this moment, the American sees that the hostess of the party, which is a woman, speaks very quietly and quietly to a boy. The woman says that there is a snake in the room. When the American sees the snake he is also calm, but he does an experiment to see if people really have the emotional control they claim they have. Upon revealing that there is a snake in the room, some people startle scream. At this point the American states that the first person to see the snake was the hostess and asks her how she perceived the animal's presence. The hostess says the snake was lying on her foot.
As we can see, the woman did not shout at the snake so close to her, which shows that she, like the American, dealt with the conflict very calmly.
