1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergij07 [2.7K]
3 years ago
14

The president chooses judges who liberally interpret the constitution. a. True b. False

History
2 answers:
Viefleur [7K]3 years ago
8 0
False
 
The president choice of federal judges is based on their policy inclinations. liberal presidents tend to appoint or choose judges that are liberal inclined while conservative presidents tend to prefer conservative judges.
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The given statement is False.

Explanation:

The president of the United States designates magistrates who neither conservatively or liberally interpret the United States' Constitution exactly as it is written instead interpret it in his own view. This is the main reason why the Supreme Court does not have only a single judge and have a group of judges. the reason behind this is that different views are required and everyone interprets uniquely.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of u. s democracy in action?
anyanavicka [17]
<span>War veterans hold a rally in front of the U.S. Capitol to show their support for
</span>a law banning the burning of the American flag. Women in the millions march on Washington, D.C. and in cities across the nation to protest unfair practices in <span>the government.

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What was Hitler’s master plan for creating an Aryan racial empire?
nignag [31]
Adolf Hitler's plan<span> was </span>to create<span> a "</span>Master<span> Race" called the Aryans.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
During the age of imperialism, suez canal connected which two bodies of water?
GaryK [48]
Mediterranean and the Red seas
5 0
4 years ago
What is the significance of John marshals ruling in Marbury vs Madison provide examples of the impact of this ruling
mafiozo [28]
Long explanation: Marshall's ruling established the precedent of judicial review by which the Supreme Court has the final say on whether a law is constitutional or unconstitutional.

Short and simple Explanation: John Marshall established judicial review through it. The judicial review that was created allows a better system of checks and balances for the other branches of government to ensure that all actions are constitutional.
7 0
2 years ago
Help meeeeee fasstttt 5 mins
frutty [35]

Answer:

how so I help you with nothing to help you on

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is Jenny’s perspective on the Indian removal
    15·1 answer
  • Each of the twelve tribes provided cities for the___ by___
    10·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIST
    13·2 answers
  • Which is a function of an office suite application?
    14·1 answer
  • How was the art of ancient Mesopotamia different from that of earlier cultures?
    13·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE BRAIN TO FIRST PERSON WHO ANSWERS CORRECT
    5·2 answers
  • Why was Japan so interested in controlling the islands in the Pacific Ocean?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the best example of a major dispute during the Constitutional Convention?
    12·2 answers
  • Explain how the cutting of Zitkala-Ša's hair is an example of forcing her to assimilate to American culture:
    13·2 answers
  • List the four stages of isolation.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!