Answer:
A
Explanation: Because i know im correct and im always correct trust me
<span>It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week.
This question is mildly ambiguous due to the word "communication". Does it mean "Speed of sending a message?" or "Speed of moving a physical object?" Given the available options as answers, I will assume the meaning is "Speed of moving a physical object?" With that in mind, let's look at the available options and see what makes sense.
It made coast-to-coast communication instantaneous.
* Even modern jets can't travel from coast to coast instantaneously, so you wouldn't expect a train to do so either. So this choice is just plain silly and therefore wrong.
It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about a week to about a day.
* A stagecoach had an average speed of about 5 mph and covered 60 to 70 miles per day. So it's not going to go from coast to coast in only a week. And since that part of the answer is wrong, this choice is wrong.
It reduced coast-to-coast communication from about 180 days to about a week.
* The 180 day estimate is definitely doable. That's an average speed of about 17 miles per day which is a good speed for a person walking day to day. And that would be about 400 miles per day for the train. The numbers make sense and this is the correct answer.
It made coast-to-coast communication more complicated.
* Let's see. Buy a train ticket and possibly arrange for 6 layovers. Or plan a multiple month trip and possibly coordinate that effort without having any rapid means of communications? This option is just plain silly when you consider the logistics of traveling for several months vs traveling for a mere week. So this is a bad choice.</span>
The answer is B - Ohio
Hope this helps!
Answer:
I can't see the boxes I'm supposed to check, but I'll give an answer: slavery.
Explanation:
The Republicans were an anti-slavery party, meaning they wanted to stop the expansion of slave states or abolish it entirely. The Dixiecrats were terrified of abolition of slavery, and fought as hard as they could to prevent it. When Lincoln, a Republican, was elected without even winning the south, it caused them to react with succession to protect the institution of slavery.
Explanation:
Alexander the Great…Was He Really?
Complete this graphic organizer to prepare you for writing your opinion about whether or not Alexander was really great. You will need to support your claim with a minimum of Two pieces of evidence that you will be able to provide solid reasoning for. Be sure to include the source for ALL of your evidence.
Claim:
Alexander of Macedonia was . . .
Support your Claim:
Evidence: (what information from the documents support your claim)
Alexander was good and bad. He was bad in a sense that his legacy was the end of Macedonian Empire that Philip and Alexander took so hard to build. His legacy was also a disaster for the Mediterranean world and for Greece, because those regions were plunged into 40-years of warfare among these successors.
Reasoning: (how does the above evidence support your claim)
Source: (which document you got your evidence from)
Evidence: (what information from the documents support your claim)
Reasoning: (how does the above evidence support your claim)
Source: (which document you got your evidence from)
In the box below write your paragraph using at least two pieces of evidence from the documents. Minimum 4-6 complete sentences.
Was Alexander the Great actually great or not so great?
