There were several actions of the government around the turn of the century that social Darwinists would disapproved of, but one of the major ones was aid to the poor.
Some of the possible solutions which a person can make use of in the case that his rights are violated are:
- Redress in court
- Informal negotiations
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the inalienable rights which an individual enjoys and cannot be tampered with except in special cases where the peace needs to be kept.
Some of the human rights includes:
- Right to life
- Right to ownership of property
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom to peaceful assembly
With this in mind, we can see that seeking redress in court is the most popular way so that the court can determine that your right was actually violated and make a legal ruling or to make use of informal negotiations in civil situations such as demanding an apology and in some cases, compensation.
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/10080939
I don’t think so. He implies women are only to be wives and mothers, which also implies the old statuses of men working, voting, owning property and women not being allowed to do so. This is not just the Justice’s personal opinion to keep to himself, and he says civil society must be based on the “law of the creator.” Personally, I think his perspective is rubbish
Answer:have no idda
Explanation:
but i think this is the type of assignment you have to do yourself cuz no one can help you
